When Fritz Attaway starts out the entire debate with this line:
Attaway:“Digital rights management is the key to consumer choice…”
He then goes on to explain how by being able to control the content, and how it can be distributed, and used, the movies studio’s can get a return on the millions they made to make a movie. See how much better that is for us? It occurred to me that he really believes that.
Wendy replies that the DMCA stifles technological innovation, and she describes that there are still no legal solutions for viewing DVD’s on her Linux computer (go Wendy). Then she throws him this:
Seltzer:“DRM plus DMCA protects existing business models, such as that of the blockbuster movie, but at the expense of new developments that could create more value for both creators and users of content. In the era of podcasts and YouTube, I’m quite interested in seeing what those users can do as they become creators.”
What she’s getting at here is that if the MPAA continues down their current path people will find ways around them, not just DRM.
Over and over again, Fritz stresses that any possible innovation around Media technologies that are disallowed because of current DRM are completely acceptable because it’s more important that the studios make money.
Fritzie:“‘Transformative’ uses are fine, but they cannot be given priority over the incentive to create new works. A central tenet of our fair use doctrine is that fair uses do not interfere with the ability of the creator to exploit the economic value of her work.”
I don’t know about you, but it seems clear to me he knows exactly who pays his bills.
The debate rages on, and is a must read.
I got my EFF Action Alert in my inbox this AM, and sure enough, the broadcast flag has jumped up again. This is the text from the newsletter:
“The Communications, Consumers Choice, and Broadband
Deployment Act of 2006 is a monster name for a monster bill
— in its latest form, it contains 159 pages of densely
plotted telecommunications reform. But while politicians
struggle with its major clauses, the RIAA and MPAA have
piggybacked their own agenda: the broadcast and audio flags,
which restrict innovation and legitimate use of recorded
digital radio and TV content. Your call today could force
the flags to find a home of their own.
The Committee markup of this bill is on Thursday, and your
Senator is on the Commerce Committee. One last push from
you could get Congress to remove the entertainment industry
mandates from the bill.”
The call to action is to either call or write your Senator. They make the process of writing your Senator incredibly easy by providing a form that you can fill out, and they provide sample text for the e-mail. I can tell you that they do get the message so I encourage you to write.
Major League Baseball says that users of placeshifters like Slingbox are lawbreakers. According to them, if you are remotely watching a baseball game that is being broadcast at your home, you are stealing from the local cable/satellite companies that paid to broadcast in the area you are watching the game.
Read More: Major League Baseball takes swing at Sling Media | CNET News.com
My two cents, I can’t imagine what MLB is trying to enforce here. The customer is paying for the content once somewhere, isn’t that all that’s important?
Not much going on lately, except that now that the summer is here, I get to clear out the backlog of shows that I recorded but didn’t watch. Including the entire season of Alias! It should actually be a fun summer. I find my viewing habits have changed so much with MythTV (or any PVR for that matter). I don’t feel the need to ‘keep up’ with shows any longer, with the exception of a couple reality TV shows.